HOME  |  ABOUT  |  ARCHIVES  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH

“Sanctuary! Sanctuary!”

Kids like stories about ugly ducklings because, deep down, they all think they’re ugly ducklings.  They like stories about Cinderella because they all think they have worth that’s gone unrecognized.  They await a prince.

They like stories in which characters get lost in the woods because they’ve all felt lost, or feared getting lost, themselves.  This is pretty basic stuff: The same myths and fairy tales have replayed across the ages because they connect with feelings that many people have had, everywhere and always.

The same kind of thing applies even if it’s just you writing a story.  If you hope to reach an audience, then some character in your story must feel or experience what your audience has felt or experienced.  The particulars of their lives may differ wildly, but their take on things must be the same.  Your audience and your character must share what I call an affinity.

Laurence Olivier
as Hamlet
I wrote last time about an affinity I had—as a kid of 15—for two fictional characters.  The first, you’ll recall, was Hamlet.  This was quite a big deal for me. Hamlet would say something like, “There is a special providence in the fall of a sparrow,” and I’d nod and say, “Got it.”

Nevertheless, there was something about Hamlet that put him at a distance.  You didn’t feel it on the page, but you felt it watching him onstage or in the movies.  Because he’s brilliant, because he’s a good soul, because—well, damn it—he’s a hero, he’s nearly always played by an especially great-looking man.  Here are some: John Barrymore, Laurence Olivier, Richard Burton, Kenneth Branaugh, Kevin Kline, Mel Gibson, Ralph Fiennes, Ethan Hawke, and Jude Law.  No potatoheads need apply.

I was not a hobbling grotesque as a teenager, but I was never going to be cast as the Prince of Denmark.  (Did you know, by the way, that Olivier padded his legs for the part? I took comfort in that.)  I did spend a lot of time in high school pining miserably for a girl named Marilyn, who was—it could not have been otherwise—a cheerleader.  As a bespectacled nerdling who actually wore sweaters to school that his mother knitted, I felt as disqualified from getting the girl as Quasimodo the bell-ringer.  So I guess it’s not surprising that Quasimodo was the second of my two fictional soul-mates.

embedded by Embedded Video

Oh, how I grieved for him—specifically, for him as played by Charles Laughton in the 1939 RKO version of The Hunchback of Notre Dame.  The purest soul who ever lived, the fellow who deserves the gypsy girl Esmeralda far more than all the dashing soldiers and poets who want her, and who swoops down on a rope to rescue her from the gallows, Quasimodo is disqualified by his ugliness from ever winning her.  “Sanctuary! Sanctuary!” he shouts, but for his heart there’s none.  High on the façade of Notre Dame he sits and watches her ride off to her happiness, and pleads to a silent gargoyle:  “Why was I not made of stone like thee?”

A gypsy girl in Paris named Esmeralda.  A cheerleader in a suburban high school named Marilyn.  They’re the same when it comes to yearning.

Love, as it turns out, is not reserved for the beautiful, but back when I thought it was—and who among us hasn’t thought at one time or another that they weren’t beautiful enough, that they were the ugly duckling?—it was the hunchback talking to the gargoyle who could break my heart.

Hamlet, it suddenly strikes me, spent some time talking to a skull, wondering, similarly, just why things are as they are.  Maybe the prince and the bell-ringer shared an affinity, too.

(I know, I know–this post sounds familiar.  It’s the second of a pair I’ve rerun from March 2010.  The idea of affinities came up last week in my short-story class, and I couldn’t resist a reprise or two.  New stuff next time.)

9 Responses to “Sanctuary! Sanctuary!”

  1. Couldn’t agree more with the affinity point, Steve. As readers or viewers, we would love to immerse ourselves in the plot and associate ourselves with the characters or protagonists, if not assume the role of a specific figure whom we share certain similarities- be they strengths or weaknesses, or certain outlooks on things. This association or connection prompts us to stay hooked on the flow of the plot. I’m not much of a writer, but I certainly feel you have hit the nail on the head. Bingo!

  2. I wonder, Desmond, if you have some fictional character in mind? I mean, in your own reading or moviegoing experience, did you encounter some character and say, “That’s me!”

  3. Well, I would say James Dean in East of Eden & Rebel Without a Cause…

  4. Of course! But I’ve gotten old enough now that I identify with his dad, the Raymond Massey character!

  5. Btw Steve, I ventured into acting back in the mid 90′s till 2000. I was lucky to have played many roles, and I found out that assuming various roles wasn’t as tough as I had expected. It could be the fact that I had had a very strong affinity thingy in me since young. Though I have never made it big here in Malaysia as an actor, I thank my lucky stars for the invaluable experience. It enables me to understand people more, and empathize with their traits and temperament. Even as a trainer now, I am able to put to use this skill ( which you named affinity)to help my participants in their learning.

  6. And what are you training people in? Acting?

  7. English as a second language, presentation skills, speech and learning English through the use of drama techniques.

  8. Pingback: At 317am, Time to Dim the Lights | 317am.net

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.



You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>